Named practitioner and continuity
Who personally leads every session, and can that person be changed without consent? Required evidence: Named coach, bio, session-delivery policy, and handoff terms.
Review evidence and risks →Executive AI Coach Review · Independent executive intelligence
Executive AI Coaching
An independent, source-backed directory and buyer resource for named human practitioners who deliver private, one-to-one executive AI coaching.
Choosing a coach
Explore the complete record →How to choose an executive AI coach
Current applied AI practice
What AI systems and executive workflows has the coach personally used recently? Required evidence: Dated examples, limitations, and a clear distinction between use and implementation claims.
Review evidence and risks →Coaching method and client agency
How does the engagement develop judgment instead of creating dependency? Required evidence: Contracting method, reflection and action cycle, client-owned artifacts, and exit criteria.
Review evidence and risks →Confidentiality and data handling
Where do files, recordings, transcripts, prompts, and notes go? Required evidence: NDA terms, tool register, retention period, model-provider terms, and deletion process.
Review evidence and risks →Role and industry context
Can the coach work inside the leader's real responsibilities without pretending to be the subject-matter decision maker? Required evidence: Relevant experience, scope boundaries, and examples of context adaptation.
Review evidence and risks →Delivery format and access
Are sessions private, synchronous, remote or in person, and what support exists between sessions? Required evidence: Cadence, duration, geography, response expectations, and accessibility.
Review evidence and risks →Coaching Insights
Explore the complete record →What changed—and what it means
Aspiro's 12-week offer needs a total-cost record
Aspiro AI Studio's provider page lists Foundation at $5,000 per month and Advisory at $10,000 per month, says each coaching program runs for 12 weeks, and describes weekly sessions of 30 or 60 minutes. The page does not say which session length belongs to which tier or state the billing dates, included session count, missed-session treatment, taxes, or total executed cost. A prospective client should obtain a single total-cost and delivery record before comparing the human-led coaching offer or authorizing payment.
Aspiro's provider page lists Foundation at $5,000 per month and Advisory at $10,000 per month.
Read the source-backed analysis →Tandem’s undated provider page lists six suggested topics of about one hour as a starting point rather than a syllabus. It says there is no standard path or imposed order, describes a regular rhythm over several months with the same practitioner, and states that there is no minimum commitment. Those statements do not establish how a specific engagement changes agenda, scope, role, records, fees, or exit. A prospective client should keep a simple client-owned change record for those decisions.
The International Coaching Federation describes coaching supervision as reflective dialogue with a trained supervisor and distinguishes it from mentor coaching focused on technical use of the Core Competencies. ICF also says supervision is not required for an initial credential, although limited supervision hours may count toward renewal and the ACTC has a specific requirement. A prospective executive client should therefore treat a supervision claim as a practice-maintenance signal to verify, not as proof of an active arrangement, AI expertise, coaching fit, or effectiveness.
ICF's current competencies describe active listening as attending to the client's context, words, emotions, energy, nonverbal cues, and emerging patterns. A coach may use AI to prepare questions, but a polished sequence can pull the conversation toward a preselected hypothesis after the client has signaled something different. A buyer should test whether the named practitioner can abandon AI-prepared material and respond to the client's live agenda while preserving autonomy and confidentiality.
The ICF Code of Ethics places technology systems, including AI, inside the professional's ethical and legal responsibilities and requires clear information-sharing agreements plus confidential record handling. A buyer should ask a prospective coach to define whether an AI note, transcript, summary, or memory is created, who can see it, how it is corrected, and when every copy is disposed before the first session.
ClaySearch says its coaching and retained-search services are separate but complementary and that about 40% of coaching clients eventually hire through the firm. A buyer should keep any move from coaching into search as a new, client-owned decision with disclosed interests, separate evidence, clean information boundaries, and a genuine option to use another search provider or none.
Coach directory
Explore the complete record →Executive AI coach directory
Factual records for one-to-one human-led executive AI coaching and private advisory offers; software and cohort programs are excluded.
Aravise
private executive AI coachAravise describes confidential one-to-one coaching with founder Chris Winters using an executive's real calendar, inbox, reports, workflows, and AI decisions, available remotely and in the Houston area.
Decision fit: Public service page reviewed; no independent outcome testing performed.
Ownership disclosure: Common-ownership disclosure required wherever this record appears. Factual inclusion only; Aravise is never ranked, scored, badged, featured as an editorial choice, or used as the default referral.
CAIO Coach
private AI leadership coachCAIO Coach publishes both weekly group coaching and private one-to-one work with Dave McClure focused on an executive's AI roadmap, team, and business context.
Decision fit: Public offer and format reviewed; private engagement quality and outcomes not independently tested.
Evaila
executive AI coach and adviserEvaila offers one-time sessions, coaching packages, and ongoing executive AI advisory tailored to a leader's role, priorities, workflows, and adoption questions.
Decision fit: Public offer and published starting-price claims reviewed; contract terms and outcomes require buyer verification.
The Grounded Leader
private AI leadership consultant-coachThe Grounded Leader describes private one-to-one work with Mathilde Pribula to design and refine personalized AI tools around a leader's values, decision style, and live challenges.
Decision fit: Public delivery description reviewed; the offer blends coaching and consulting and should be contracted accordingly.
Arlantus Consulting
AI leadership coach and adviserArlantus presents retainer-based executive coaching, strategic advisory, and leadership alignment for senior executives and boards navigating AI-driven change.
Decision fit: Public engagement model reviewed; coaching and advisory roles must be separated in a buyer's agreement.
Executive AI Institute
integrated executive AI coaching teamExecutive AI Institute offers named leadership and transformation coaches individually or together in bespoke one-to-one programs joining strategic alignment and execution planning.
Decision fit: Public coach biographies and offer structure reviewed; buyer should verify who attends each session and handles client data.
Jack Sterling Advisory
on-demand one-to-one AI coachJack Sterling Advisory markets remote, one-hour coaching sessions that combine personalized AI skill training and mentorship for executives and professionals.
Decision fit: Public session format and listed price reviewed; no independent assessment of coach matching or claimed time savings.
A.D.A.P.T. AI Coaching
executive AI coach and trainerA.D.A.P.T. describes personalized one-to-one coaching and corporate training organized around an applied business-first framework for leaders.
Decision fit: Public claims and testimonials reviewed as provider statements; reported counts and outcomes are not independently audited here.
AI x Leaders
private executive AI coachAI x Leaders describes a three-to-six-month, one-to-one engagement using an executive's real files, delivered over video or in person in Paris.
Decision fit: Public offer, duration, and geography reviewed; confidentiality and file-handling details require direct diligence.
Ken Cox Virtual AI Creative Director & Implementer
AI creative direction, implementation, and executive partnership; current coaching-category fit is unverifiedThe current homepage describes a selective client engagement spanning creative direction, AI infrastructure, content systems, live implementation, and executive partnership. It does not publish a current one-to-one coaching format.
Decision fit: The current homepage was reviewed on 2026-08-20. The previously recorded AI Confidence page described six hours of one-to-one coaching but returned a live 404 on 2026-08-20, so that superseded format is not treated as current evidence and this record should not enter a coaching shortlist without a new exact public offer.
AscendAI
private executive AI coach and adviserAscendAI presents a private one-to-one engagement with founder Kevin Williams for senior leaders seeking practical AI fluency, workflow design, and sensitive decision support.
Decision fit: Public founder-led offer reviewed; client and outcome assertions remain provider claims unless independently documented.
AI Ready Executive
one-to-one AI coach for business leadersAI Ready Executive offers tailored one-to-one coaching for executives and business owners focused on applying AI to leadership, decisions, planning, and team adoption.
Decision fit: Public service description reviewed; coach credentials, detailed methods, and results require buyer verification.
Credentials and ethics
Explore the complete record →Coaching credentials, ethics, and professional standards
Coaching research
Explore the complete record →Executive AI coaching research and evidence and decision tools
Executive AI Coach Evidence Census
A versioned dataset and market brief with no composite ranking.
Read the research protocol →